Skip to main content

Be Known To Us In Breaking Bread

There's nothing so irritating as someone who doesn't know what's going on, especially when everyone else is glued to the news because of some headline grabbing event that has stirred things up. The two disciples, Cleopas and his unnamed companion – probably his wife, cannot believe it when the stranger asks them, 'What things?' [1]
We've all been in the same situation, haven't we? 'You mean to tell me that you don't know! Where have you been?' we ask, incredulously. 'Haven't you seen ”The News”?'
Of course, there's more than a smidgen of irony here. If the stranger has lost touch it's not because he forgot to turn on the TV news bulletins. He's been dead and buried! And all the time – whether he was alive or dead – he was at the very centre of the events they describe. When the two disciples explain how Jesus of Nazareth was handed over to be condemned to death and crucified, and how – since then – his body has disappeared from the tomb, the stranger knows exactly what they are talking about! He has been there and done it.
St Luke's decision to gloss over the stranger's explanation of what it all means sets a precedent which soon gave rise to a dangerous trend in early Christianity. All manner of people came up with ready explanations of precisely what it was that Jesus had shared with his disciples during his resurrection appearances. Their starting point was always that Jesus needed to interpret the secret truth about himself which is hidden in the Scriptures. And, of course, they – and they alone – had the low down on what it all really means. Forget the obvious interpretation, this is the truth which was revealed to the two disciples on the way to Emmaus, or to Thomas on the Mount of Olives, or to Judas Iscariot.
This to misunderstand entirely what St Luke is trying to say. There is no big secret. We already have the key which will unlock the true meaning that lies concealed within the text. If we want to understand the God whom the Old and New Testaments are pointing us to, we simply need to keep in mind that God's Go-Between, Jesus, had to suffer before he could enter into his glory. Those were the only rules of the game and, once we have recognised that, some of the long narrative of salvation history begins to make sense – the forty years which the people of Israel had to spend in the wilderness, their exile to Babylon, the prophecies about the Suffering Servant who would redeem Israel, and the story of Jesus himself.
St Luke never claims, in any case, that knowledge is the key to understanding. The disciples listen, but they do not hear what the stranger is saying to them. The moment of recognition comes not as he unfolds the secret mysteries to them on the road, but in the simple act of breaking and sharing bread. It is only then that their eyes are opened and, with the benefit of hindsight, they remember how their hearts burned within them while he was opening the meaning of the Scriptures.
Readers of books like The Da Vince Code are easily convinced that there are still conspiracies and secrets waiting to be uncovered which will reveal the truth about Christianity. This so amused Peter Smith, the judge in the recent trial of Dan Brown for plagiarism, that he concealed a cryptic message within his Judgement, using a code which he had invented especially for the occasion, 'The Smithy Code'. The judge said he didn't see why his ruling shouldn't be fun – a view that surely can't be shared by the losers in the case, the authors of The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail.
But the really exciting thing that is waiting to be discovered is not a secret at all. St Luke explains that it is this – we can encounter the risen Jesus ourselves as we gather around the table to share Holy Communion. He is with us, and makes himself known to us, every time the bread is blessed and broken.
[1] Luke 24.13-49


Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his head. I suspect …

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18
In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings.

But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact!

Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet app…

Why are good people tempted to do wrong?

Deuteronomy 30.15-20, Psalm 119.1-8, 1 Corinthians 3.1-4, Matthew 5.21-37 Why are good people tempted to do wrong? Sometimes we just fall from the straight and narrow and do mean, selfish or spiteful things. But sometimes we convince ourselves that we’re still good people even though we’re doing something wrong. We tell ourselves that there are some people whose motives are totally wicked or self-regarding: criminals, liars, cheats, two-timers, fraudsters, and so on, but we are not that kind of person. We’re basically good people who just indulge in an occasional misdemeanour. So, for example, there’s Noble Cause Corruption, a phrase first coined apparently in 1992 to explain why police officers, judges, politicians, managers, teachers, social workers and so on sometimes get sucked into justifying actions which are really totally wrong, but on the grounds that they are doing them for a very good reason. A famous instance of noble cause corruption is the statement, by the late Lord Denni…