Skip to main content

Taking risks for God

Matthew 10.24-39

This section of Matthew’s Gospel is a collection of Jesus’ sayings, all of which are also found in other New Testament passages. One, an amplification of some words found in Mark’s Gospel, also closely parallels one of Micah’s prophecies about families turning against each other, as well as being almost identical to a saying recorded by Luke. Did Jesus say similar things on different occasions, some shorter and more pithy, others longer and more resonant with Micah’s warning? It’s more than likely that he did.

There’s almost a random quality about this grouping of Jesus’ sayings. Almost all of them also occur in Luke’s version of events, and some are echoed by John, but in completely different contexts. They are then, what people sometimes call, ‘floating sayings’ - memorable phrases or comments, but no one knows when Jesus said them or how many times.

I say, the grouping of the sayings looks ‘almost’ random because, on closer examination, they all seem to be about conflict. Jesus has been vilified, so his disciples must expect similar treatment. They’re called to proclaim openly what he’s told them in private, and suddenly this idea is linked to people killing the body, which implies that proclaiming the Gospel is likely to provoke fierce opposition. The reward for sticking our necks out is that Jesus will put in a good word for us when our deeds are being sifted before God.

This brings us to the quotation from Micah about whole families being in conflict with one another. When our younger son Matthew was three years-old I had a duel with him in the garden using plastic toy swords. I parried his blows for a while before letting my guard drop. In an instant he stabbed me, exclaiming, ‘Take that, sucker!’

Well, Jesus expects us to take it, too! He hasn’t come to make life easy for his disciples. We’re to expect the sharp and pointy sword of suffering rather than peace, perfect peace. Whoever doesn’t take up the cross and follow him is not worthy of being his disciple.

Perhaps these are useful lessons as we emerge from lockdown. We’re having to reconcile ourselves to risk-taking again. Someone told our daughter that she would send her children back to school when there was no risk involved, but that day will never come. Those who try to keep their life at all costs will inevitably lose it one day. Those who are willing to lose their life for Jesus’ sake will find it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a

Meeting Jesus on Zoom

‘Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.’ (John 20.19-31 ( https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA) This is my second reflection about today’s Gospel reading but I wanted to write something about meeting Jesus on Zoom. Zoom’s been very useful during the lockdown, but it’s also got a bad press. Various mischief makers have gatecrashed meetings on Zoom, either to eavesdrop or make inappropriate comments. That’s why worshippers needed permission to join our on-line service this week. If they managed to press all the right buttons, and entered all the right codes, they should've found themselves looking at a screen not unlike the cartoon picture below of the eleven apostles trying to meet on Zoom with the risen Jesus. Anyone who couldn't see the service on the screen would've been in good company. In the cartoon Jesus has done something wrong. Either he hasn’t enabled Zoom to t