Skip to main content

Truth will prevail

Jeremiah 20.7-13 (NRSV)

This is a page from Jeremiah's spiritual journal where he reflects privately on the difficulties of being a prophet. His name’s forever associated with doom and gloom; to this day people accuse pessimistic forecasters of being ‘a Jeremiah’. And of course his bleak warnings got on people’s nerves. They took turns either to reproach him for lowering national morale or to deride him for being a ‘remoaner’, always imagining disaster instead of planning for success. 

Even his friends distanced themselves from Jeremiah. After all, he’d spent time in prison for his stand against the government’s foolishly optimistic policies. ‘Terror is all around!’ they whispered, ‘Why not conform?’ When he still refused to listen there was understandable pressure on his allies to denounce him. Some people tried to entice him to change sides, others tried to wear him down. His enemies tried to take revenge on him for the damage that his fearless campaigning had done to their reputations.

This is only one interpretation of Jeremiah’s enigmatic journal entry, but it’s a convincing one. An alternative version, taken from the ancient Greek translation, has his acquaintances conspiring against him, or fearing that they’ll be caught up in those conspiracies. It has Jeremiah plagued with self doubt, faithlessness and misery, whereas the New Revised Standard Version has him thinking to himself that he must continue warning about violence and destruction.

However, all of the versions agree that Jeremiah felt an inner compulsion to continue prophesying, even when he wanted to stop. A burning fire which he couldn’t bear, raged within him. He was weary from holding in the message. Like someone with Tourette’s Syndrome, he had to let the message out, and when he spoke the Lord took possession of him like a strong or fearsome warrior.

Many preachers, witnesses and whistleblowers have testified to the irresistible urge to say what needed to be said, which wouldn’t leave them alone until they’d done it. Is this how we feel about speaking for the Lord, and speaking out against injustice and wrong-doing? Truth is mighty, thinks Jeremiah, and will prevail, because it derives from the God who knows everything.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a

Meeting Jesus on Zoom

‘Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.’ (John 20.19-31 ( https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA) This is my second reflection about today’s Gospel reading but I wanted to write something about meeting Jesus on Zoom. Zoom’s been very useful during the lockdown, but it’s also got a bad press. Various mischief makers have gatecrashed meetings on Zoom, either to eavesdrop or make inappropriate comments. That’s why worshippers needed permission to join our on-line service this week. If they managed to press all the right buttons, and entered all the right codes, they should've found themselves looking at a screen not unlike the cartoon picture below of the eleven apostles trying to meet on Zoom with the risen Jesus. Anyone who couldn't see the service on the screen would've been in good company. In the cartoon Jesus has done something wrong. Either he hasn’t enabled Zoom to t