Skip to main content

The Olympic Torch and The Olympic Spirit

1 Corinthians 9.24-27
Genesis 18.1-8

Did anyone see the torch? It went past the very place where my wife Helen works, so she saw the torch. It was being carried by the son of Jane Tomlinson, the woman who raised nearly two millions pounds for charity by undertaking a series of sporting challenges. But I only saw it on television. The nearest I got to it in person was sitting next to a young woman, at a meeting on Friday, who carried it when it came to Sheffield. 

Perhaps the most memorable moment on the torch’s visit to Yorkshire was when disabled soldier Ben Parkinson, who was wounded in Afghanistan, carried the torch in Doncaster. It took him 26 minutes to carry it 300 metres, and afterwards he said he was so proud to have done it.

The torch coming to Yorkshire seemed to get people really excited. The young woman who said she carried the torch in Sheffield took it to work with her next day and everyone wanted to be photographed with it. Wherever it went it really seemed to bring out the Olympic Spirit.

But what is the Olympic Spirit? The modern Olympics were invented in the Nineteenth Century. Various people tried to invoke the ancient Olympic Spirit and get it going again, but the man who started the international Olympics that we know today was called Pierre de Coubertin. Does anyone know how he described the Olympic Spirit? He said, ‘The important thing is not to win, but to take part.’

It’s a very good principle, yet it’s not the official Olympic Spirit, because the Olympic movement has its own vision statement, which says: "The Spirit of the Olympics is to build a peaceful and better world, and to inspire and motivate the young people of the world to be the best they can be, and to promote tolerance and understanding in these increasingly troubled time in which we live, to make our world a more peaceful place."

There was a 90 something year-old man on the television news on Friday who took part in the Olympics the last time they were in England, in 1948. He said he had tried to live by the Olympic Spirit his whole life long.

Paul said in our Bible reading that taking part is not enough. He felt we should all play to win and be the best that we can be. But he would have approved of the Olympic Spirit - building a peaceful and better world, and promoting tolerance and understanding to make our world a more peaceful place.

There is another bit to the Olympic Spirit which I didn’t read out before. I think it’s the reason why our Old Testament story was chosen to be read in services about the Olympics. The bit I missed out before says: “The Olympic Spirit aims to instill and develop the values and ideals of Olympism in those who visit.”

I don’t like the ugly word Olympism. But the point of this part of the Olympic vision is that it talks about those who visit - in other words people visiting from around the world to take part in or to watch the Games. The Olympic Spirit isn’t just about taking part or even playing to win. It’s about coming together from around the world. And its about people in Britain giving a welcome to all our visitors.

The reading is about strangers being made welcome. The Bible says that when we welcome strangers we meet God.


Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his head. I suspect …

Why are good people tempted to do wrong?

Deuteronomy 30.15-20, Psalm 119.1-8, 1 Corinthians 3.1-4, Matthew 5.21-37 Why are good people tempted to do wrong? Sometimes we just fall from the straight and narrow and do mean, selfish or spiteful things. But sometimes we convince ourselves that we’re still good people even though we’re doing something wrong. We tell ourselves that there are some people whose motives are totally wicked or self-regarding: criminals, liars, cheats, two-timers, fraudsters, and so on, but we are not that kind of person. We’re basically good people who just indulge in an occasional misdemeanour. So, for example, there’s Noble Cause Corruption, a phrase first coined apparently in 1992 to explain why police officers, judges, politicians, managers, teachers, social workers and so on sometimes get sucked into justifying actions which are really totally wrong, but on the grounds that they are doing them for a very good reason. A famous instance of noble cause corruption is the statement, by the late Lord Denni…

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18
In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings.

But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact!

Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet app…