Skip to main content

Overcoming Chaos

Isaiah 27
Can chaos be undone? The legend of Leviathan is an ancient story which pre-dates the Bible. It was first written down in the ancient city of Ugarit in Syria, at least 1,000 years before the prophecies of Isaiah were assembled. It tells how God, or in the Ugarit version one of the gods, slew the chaos monster Leviathan, who lived in the primordial sea, so that the earth and the oceans could be separated and an ordered creation set in motion.
Isaiah imagines a world where the chaos monster got away somehow. It wasn’t slain after all, it only went into hiding, lurking in the depths, waiting for a chance to re-emerge. And re-emerge it did, which is why the prophet thinks the world is in such chaos now.
That’s why the ancient kingdom of Israel was broken up and its people dispersed. Chaos was at work. But a day will come when chaos will at last be banished. ‘The sea monster will squirm and try to escape, but the Lord will kill him.’
Isaiah uses another ancient story, in which Israel was depicted as a vineyard planted by God. He built a wall around it and a watch tower. He watered the young vines, and they might have flourished, but chaos Israel disobeyed God, and all his good work was undone. Instead of vines, the vineyard produced thorns. And then the wall was broken down and the watch tower abandoned. Wild animals roamed across the vineyard. It was a mess. Chaos reigned supreme. It’s a picturesque way of describing how Israel was defeated and destroyed, and her people marched away into exile.
But Isaiah subverts the story. He imagines chaos being undone. Now the Lord is no longer angry. He will protect the vineyard and always keep it watered. He will guard it day and night to keep it from harm. If it continues to depend on him for protection, instead of going its own way, he will become the vineyard’s friend and be at peace with it.
This time Israel will take root so strongly that her blossom and fruit shall no longer be confined to the vineyard but will spill out over the retaining wall and cover the earth, Scorching heat will chase away her troublesome enemies, the wild animals that might have eaten her tender shoots.
Meanwhile, the world as it is now is still ruled by chaos, and Isaiah describes what it looks like. Israel’s fortress cities have been left abandoned. Cattle walk through the ruins stripping the trees bare of their remaining leaves. Women gather the broken branches for firewood, but they are just the remnant of a once proud nation, collaborators and marginal people, semi-nomads perhaps, who the conquerors were happy to leave behind. Isaiah calls them stupid or ‘without understanding’. They’re not the antidote to chaos, they’re a symptom of it.
But the time is coming when the Lord will shake things down and as a result of the shaking, or sifting, his scattered people will be brought together again. It will be like threshing grain to separate the wheat from the chaff. The people of Israel, who were dragged away in chains, will return and worship God on his holy mountain - the visible proof that chaos has finally been banished.
It’s a pious hope, but of course the story never came true. Chaos cannot be undone, except by a Cross. It’s Jesus’ death which finally vanquishes Leviathan, and not with a cruel, sharp sword, but with the power of love.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...