Skip to main content

A change of heart

Deuteronomy 29.1-15, Matthew 15.1-9
The Old Testament Books of the Law spend a lot of time spelling out what the people of Israel needed to do to share in God’s covenant with them. This makes the Jewish faith sound like a religion of rules and regulations rather than an offer of release and freedom.

But this is only part of the story. Deuteronomy also reminds its readers about God's loving kindness to their ancestors. The nation’s wanderings in the wilderness might have been a gruelling test, which the people had to endure for 40 years, but as well as rescuing them from slavery in the first place, God had given them clothes and shoes to wear on their travels which wouldn't wear out. So the wilderness experience had shown people God's incredible goodness as well as his stern refusal to compromise on the rules and accept second best.

The writer also recognises that challenging people to remember past kindnesses will not by itself encourage them to be obedient to God. The ceremony depicted here in Moab, just outside the Land of Israel, is the first record of the renewal of the covenant promise that God had originally made with his people on the holy mountain of Horeb. The wilderness years which followed the original covenant promise had proved that simply trying to keep the covenant is not enough. So the renewal of the covenant has to be accompanied by personal renewal too.The writer says, 'The Lord must give you a change of heart before you truly understand what you have seen and heard.’

Expanding on this idea in chapter 30 verse six, the writer says, ‘Moreover, the Lord your God will circumcise your heart and the hearts of your descendants, so that you will love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, in order that you may live.’ Adherence to the covenant has to be about much more than going through the motions and following the right religious observances - Sunday worship, prayer, Bible study and whatever. It has to go right to the core of who we are and transform the way we live.

Christianity continues this insight into how the covenant relationship works. While we must continually rehearse God's loving kindness in sending Jesus to die for us on the Cross, and while we must try to follow his example in our own lives, what we really need is a personal change of heart. Without that we can never become worthy partners in the covenant. But we can't simply wish to have a change of heart; it's something which God's Spirit must give us. Only then will we truly understand what's required of us in order to be able to live the covenant.

Underlying the writer's understanding of the covenant is his conviction that it's not just 'empty words’ (32.47) but something which will transform the way our lives turn out. The NRSV version of the same verse puts it like this: ‘[The covenant] 'is no trifling matter but rather your very life.’

The Pharisees tried to take seriously the idea of committing ourselves entirely to God by making the whole of life holy. This meant that complicated rules about hand washing, that were originally intended for priests serving in the Temple, were applied to ordinary meal times, because every moment’s meant to be sacred and every meal’s supposed to be an offering to God.

Jesus shared the Pharisees’ commitment to radical holiness and to the priesthood of all believers, but rebuked them for confusing outward holiness with the real thing, which is inner holiness. He quotes the Old Testament when he says in response that 'this people honours me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.’

The annual covenant prayer is an opportunity to remind ourselves of all that God has done for us in the past and to ask him to renew us heart and soul for the future, both as individuals and as a church community. In that spirit let us renew our covenant today.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more

Luther and Loyola

James 1:17-27 Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23 Within Christianity there has always been a tension between two poles. At one end of the spectrum stands Martin Luther, who said that Christian faith is about trusting in God to put us right - or make us righteous - through the saving death of Jesus. Luther came to this conclusion when he was a professor of New Testament studies in a little town in Germany called Wittenberg. One year he decided to teach his students about Paul’s letter to the Romans and that’s when it suddenly dawned upon him that Christian faith is all about trust. At the other end of the spectrum , stands someone like Ignatius Loyola the founder of the Society of Jesus. He spent a lot of his later life in crisis, first struggling to overcome severe wounds that he had suffered when he was a soldier and then during two short periods locked up in a cell by the Spanish Inquisition. He came to believe that the Christian life is a similar sort of struggle, a lifelon...
Post a Comment
Read more