Skip to main content

A living hope in testing times


1 Peter 1:3-9 (https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA)
This passage is one of the few places in the New Testament which seems to allude to another New Testament book. Verse 8, where the writer says, ‘Although you have not seen him, you love him,’ brings to mind Jesus’ parting words to Thomas in John’s Gospel (20.29). That’s why it’s included alongside the same Gospel passage in last Sunday’s lectionary.
However, the relevance of this passage to our current situation is also striking. The readers are asked to ‘rejoice’ that they ‘are protected by the power of God… even if now for a little while [they] have had to suffer various trials.’ The writer doesn’t suggest that the readers will be protected from harm or from trials, only that they will be brought through the trials ‘into an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, ….ready to be revealed in the last time.’
So what is the guarantee that God is able to protect us, even if we are ‘tested [in the] fire’ of suffering? The writer says, ‘The resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead’ is the one thing that can give us ‘a new birth into a living hope’. That is the new birth which Mary Magdalene, Thomas and the other disciples experienced after the first Easter Day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...