Skip to main content

Reflections on the Seven Words of Jesus from the Cross: 6 It is finished

When Jesus had received the wine, he said, ‘It is finished.’ Then he bowed his head and gave up his spirit. John 19.30 (https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA)
Like ‘I thirst’, ‘It is finished’ is another apparently simple statement. But, of course, it’s capable of two interpretations. 
John’s Gospel doesn’t include Jesus’ desolate cry that he’d been forsaken by God. ‘It is finished,’ could be an alternative translation - into Greek and English - of Jesus’ original words in Aramaic. 
If this were the case then it would mean Jesus’ ministry was ‘finished’ in the sense that cornered people, who’ve run out of road to flee along, might say, ‘We’re finished!’ The only options remaining in that situation are death or dishonour, and Jesus chooses death, which is - in most circumstances - the ultimate end to any project. A cause really is finished when the person who was leading it is killed and his followers are dispersed. A cause is completely finished when it seems to have been abandoned even by God.
But whatever Jesus meant when he said, ‘It is finished,’ this isn’t how John interprets those words. He tells us that Jesus knew that ‘already everything had been brought to perfection’ when - to make perfect the many allusions to scripture in the story of how he’d died - he called out for a drink. Having satisfied his thirst he said, ‘It is finished,’ meaning ‘It is perfected’ or ‘accomplished’ or ‘complete’, a bit like someone triumphantly inserting the last piece into a particularly challenging jigsaw puzzle.
‘It is finished’ means ‘I have done it!’ and safe in this knowledge Jesus ‘bowed his head and gave up his spirit.’
'This is  the end!' Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer told his cellmates when two Gestapo officers came to escort him to the gallows, 'For me the beginning of life!'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a

Meeting Jesus on Zoom

‘Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.’ (John 20.19-31 ( https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA) This is my second reflection about today’s Gospel reading but I wanted to write something about meeting Jesus on Zoom. Zoom’s been very useful during the lockdown, but it’s also got a bad press. Various mischief makers have gatecrashed meetings on Zoom, either to eavesdrop or make inappropriate comments. That’s why worshippers needed permission to join our on-line service this week. If they managed to press all the right buttons, and entered all the right codes, they should've found themselves looking at a screen not unlike the cartoon picture below of the eleven apostles trying to meet on Zoom with the risen Jesus. Anyone who couldn't see the service on the screen would've been in good company. In the cartoon Jesus has done something wrong. Either he hasn’t enabled Zoom to t