Skip to main content

What comes after lockdown?

Psalm 116.1-4,12-19 (https://www.biblegateway.com/ NRSVA)
People are beginning to ask, ‘What comes after lockdown?’ In a sense, whatever measures are taken to relax the lockdown will only be the beginning of the end. First, they’re likely to be cautious and incremental, with those most at risk encouraged to go on isolating themselves as far as possible from contact with the outside world. And then, they’re likely to be provisional. A second, and maybe even a third, wave of the pandemic is expected. Severe lockdown measures may need to be reimposed, perhaps in specific places where the number of cases of coronavirus has suddenly risen. Nonetheless, there’s a growing hope that - if the right steps are taken - we might be able to move on from the present paralysis in our economy and our social lives.
This is the place where we encounter the psalmist. He or she is getting over a serious illness. Things looked bad; it was a time of anguish and distress. ‘The snares of death encompassed me,’ the psalmist says. But the Lord heard the psalmist’s supplications.
Some people have seen this as a psalm about resurrection, or at least about life after death, because the psalmist goes on to say, ‘Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his faithful ones.’ Undoubtedly the psalmist believes that God continues to care for us after we die, but verse 19 makes clear that the psalmist’s thanksgiving will be offered to God in the Temple at Jerusalem, not in heaven.
So, although the psalmist affirms that God has not forgotten those who lost their lives to this illness, the psalm is about life after lockdown, about second chances, about what recovery might look like. The Lord has loosed the psalmist’s bonds and the psalmist will ‘now call on the name of the Lord’ and says, ‘I will pay my vows to the Lord in the presence of all his people.’

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his head. I suspect …

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18
In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings.

But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact!

Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet app…

Why are good people tempted to do wrong?

Deuteronomy 30.15-20, Psalm 119.1-8, 1 Corinthians 3.1-4, Matthew 5.21-37 Why are good people tempted to do wrong? Sometimes we just fall from the straight and narrow and do mean, selfish or spiteful things. But sometimes we convince ourselves that we’re still good people even though we’re doing something wrong. We tell ourselves that there are some people whose motives are totally wicked or self-regarding: criminals, liars, cheats, two-timers, fraudsters, and so on, but we are not that kind of person. We’re basically good people who just indulge in an occasional misdemeanour. So, for example, there’s Noble Cause Corruption, a phrase first coined apparently in 1992 to explain why police officers, judges, politicians, managers, teachers, social workers and so on sometimes get sucked into justifying actions which are really totally wrong, but on the grounds that they are doing them for a very good reason. A famous instance of noble cause corruption is the statement, by the late Lord Denni…