Skip to main content

Can't You Sleep?

Samuel 3.1-10

Like the little bear in Martin Waddell's story ‘Can’t you sleep little bear?’ the boy Samuel – who was probably not much older than six or seven – couldn’t sleep one night. Before dawn, while it was still dark, he was woken by a voice calling to him. He ran to his master, the old priest Eli, who was sleeping in another room. He thought Eli must be calling him, but Eli was still asleep. When the boy Samuel asked him what he wanted, Eli told Samuel to go back to bed.


This happened three times, and Eli could easily have got a bit irritated, but like Big Bear in the story he was very wise and kind. Instead of getting cross he tried to figure out what was troubling Samuel. And then it occurred to him that perhaps God was calling Samuel’s name.

The story reminds us that when God calls us it’s not always easy to recognise his voice. It’s a bit like taking part in a sound quiz. Can we recognise at once what all the sounds are when we hear them? Or would we find it difficult to tell the difference between lions and tigers?

God sometimes talks to us through the Bible, or through other stories and poems, or through music and pictures. Sometimes it’s a particular experience that inspires us and connects us with God, such as the birth of a baby or climbing a high mountain. Sometimes God speaks to us through other people. The Prophet Hosea, for instance, heard God speaking to him – and to Israel – through his wife and children. What they said and did inspired him and made him realize what God was saying.

Sometimes, and the Prophet Elijah particularly comes to mind here, God speaks to us through a still small voice, like a whisper, in our heads. Sometimes people actually hear a voice calling to them, just as the boy Samuel did.

Once we have heard God speaking to us, of course, the next thing we have to do is take notice of what he is saying and do something about it. That’s why the old priest Eli told Samuel to say, ‘Speak, Lord, your servant is listening!’ The right response – when God speaks to us – is first to listen and then to do, to be a listener, yes, but also a servant, a doer of God’s word.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...