Skip to main content

Looking Forward To The Birth

Romans 8.22-27
John 15:26-27; 16:4b-15


If you’re waiting for a baby to be born it’s very hard to imagine what he or she will look like when the time comes and you finally get to hold them in your arms. That’s part of the miracle of parenthood; getting to hold a tiny, fully formed human being who, a few minutes before, it was impossible to picture in any but the vaguest and most general way.

Before Matthew was born we were invited to attend the 12 week scan at the hospital. ‘Bring your older children with you,’ the midwife advised, ‘They will love being able to see the baby inside you. It will help them to relate better to what’s going to happen because the baby will seem more real to them.’

So we all went along, expecting to see a clear picture on the monitor of Matthew lying inside Helen’s womb. But no such luck. We were living in Wigan at the time, and the hospital seemed to be operating with secondhand ultrasound equipment passed down by a hospital that had now got more up-to-date kit. The monitor was black and white, and extremely fuzzy and none of us could make out anything at all.

‘Look! That’s the baby’s head,’ said the radiographer, pointing to an indistinct blob. But none of us were convinced.

In contrast, when our daughter Jenny went to have her 12 week scan for Erin, my elder granddaughter, the picture was so sharp and clear that we could even count the fingers when she posted the photograph of the scan on Facebook. Admittedly Erin looked more like a miniature version of The Jolly Roger, but everyone could see that there was definitely a baby growing inside Jenny and that she had arms and legs, and so on, and was apparently sucking he thumb.

We no longer have to wait until the mother is groaning in labour pains before we get to see who’s coming. Mothers and fathers still have to hope the baby will be all right, but in these days of scans and tests we can see the baby before he or she arrives and, as Paul remarks, ‘hope that is seen is not hope’.

Nonetheless, in Paul’s day the analogy held good. An expectant mother was someone who was hoping everything would be all right. Likewise, says Paul, the Spirit helps us where imagination fails. When we can’t put our most deeply felt prayers into words, the Spirit intercedes for us. Perhaps the sighs of the Spirit here are not just an echo of the groans of a woman in labour but also a reference to speaking in tongues. Be that as it may, when we can’t even give any shape to our unconscious fears and aspirations, the Spirit searches our hearts and knows what we are feeling. We, and indeed the whole of creation, have not yet become what we are intended to be because we are still waiting to realise our true potential when we are adopted into God’s being, presumably beyond death or at the end of time, but in the meantime the Spirit is there to help us.

When we think of the Spirit as an advocate, I guess we usually think - like St Paul - of the Spirit advocating our cause before God. As we saw in the dramatic reading earlier, the word ‘advocate’ suggests that the Spirit might be like a defence lawyer pleading for a suspended sentence, or a fundraiser advocating a project to a charitable trust and trying to get a big grant to keep it going in hard times, or a passionate campaigner promoting something close to their heart, like peace or justice or an end to hunting baby seals.

But John thinks of the Advocate coming to us from God to keep us in touch with Jesus, to keep reminding us of his call to us in the way that Jesus was able to do himself when he met people during his earthly life. It’s a bit like having a voice in our head constantly saying to us, ‘What would Jesus want me to do?’ So, it is the Spirit of Jesus at least in the sense that it pleads his cause. The Spirit will not speak on its own, but will speak the words that Jesus would want it to say to us.

But the Spirit does not come to advocate for Jesus so that we will have a nice warm feeling inside or know what to do when we’re in a tight corner. It comes to give us the words to say when we testify for him in a hostile and alien world.

The coming of the Spirit confirms three truths which Jesus says we might not otherwise have understood: that sin is not about what we do but about what we believe, that being put right with God - or made righteous - is about putting our trust in the saving power of Jesus’ death, and that Jesus’ death turns upside down the values of the world. The forces that seem to rule our world - greed, naked self-interest and hedonism - have already been overcome, despite every appearance to the contrary. This inner and unshakable conviction is ours because we have the Spirit of Truth to guide us into all the truth, and this truth is what can inspire us to keep on testifying for Jesus in our own words and actions every day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a

Meeting Jesus on Zoom

‘Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.’ (John 20.19-31 ( https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA) This is my second reflection about today’s Gospel reading but I wanted to write something about meeting Jesus on Zoom. Zoom’s been very useful during the lockdown, but it’s also got a bad press. Various mischief makers have gatecrashed meetings on Zoom, either to eavesdrop or make inappropriate comments. That’s why worshippers needed permission to join our on-line service this week. If they managed to press all the right buttons, and entered all the right codes, they should've found themselves looking at a screen not unlike the cartoon picture below of the eleven apostles trying to meet on Zoom with the risen Jesus. Anyone who couldn't see the service on the screen would've been in good company. In the cartoon Jesus has done something wrong. Either he hasn’t enabled Zoom to t