Skip to main content

Holding on to memories

2 Peter 1.12-21
Whether the writer is the real Peter, or a colleague of his or simply someone writing from his perspective, he writes here very much from the viewpoint of the older Peter living in Rome just before his martyrdom. People often say, as they get older, that time seems to fly by faster and become more precious. It’s not an original idea. It is voiced here by the writer, and other people had probably said the same thing to him.
Memories become more important with age too. We have so many of them and they become ever more precious the further away in time they recede. There is always the fear of losing our memories, or indeed of losing the capacity to remember. So from the perspective of the first eyewitnesses of Jesus’ ministry, there was a desperate anxiety to preserve their memories of him, pass them on and make sure they were cherished.
It’s fashionable to say that the Christian story is a ‘cleverly devised myth’ dreamt up for the most part by St Paul and the writers of the Gospels, and only loosely based on the real historical Jesus. But this isn’t a new claim. It is anticipated here by the writer of 2 Peter, who is at pains to say that the Christian story is based on the recollections of people who actually witnessed these events and passed on everything they felt was of abiding significance. So we don’t get the incidental details - what people were wearing, what they looked like, and so on - but they did strive to preserve the essentials.
The writer singles out just one example, probably because only Peter, James and John were there. It’s the semi-mystical experience they shared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration when they heard God speaking to them - the writer reminds us - and telling them that Jesus was his beloved Son.
The writer is at pains to explain that this was a real incident. It isn’t just something devised by later Christians who were inserting Old Testament motifs - like the encounters that Moses and Elijah had with God on mountain tops - into the life story of Jesus.
A certain amount of that did happen. Things which, at the time, puzzled his followers, were later understood to have been ways in which Old Testament prophecy was being fulfilled. But there is a kernel of truth behind these reflections. History really did confirm the prophecies, at least if you understand those prophecies in a certain way, but the prophecies weren’t being used to construct an elaborate myth about someone who had really been being quite ordinary. The writer says that Christianity isn’t just a matter of interpretation - of people making the Old Testament fit their own bizarre or fanciful notions about Jesus - it’s about people being moved by the Holy Spirit to see a new and deeper meaning in those prophecies because of their encounter with Jesus.
So all those memories of Jesus that the first eyewitnesses shared, and their reflections on what they meant, become really important. They are the glimmer of light that we must keep our focus on, even in dark times, until ‘the day dawns and the morning star rises in our hearts’ and we know for ourselves the truth about Jesus.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his head. I suspect …

True Love

Mark 12:28-34 In 1981 Prince Charles was put on the spot during a television interview with Lady Diana Spencer, his new fiancee. The interviewer asked them if they were in love. Lady Diana’s instant response was , ‘Of course!,’ but Prince Charles replied, ‘Whatever “in love” means.’ Now in case you think Prince Charles is just a bit of a cold fish, on National Poetry Day 2015 he read a poem on Radio 4, ‘My love is like a red, red rose’ by Robbie Burns. I thought, ‘This is going to be a bit wooden,’ but I was wrong. He read the poem so movingly that Clarence House has made it available on YouTube and Twitter. Listening to him it was impossible to escape the conclusion that he now knows what being “in love” means. O my Love is like a red, red rose, That's newly sprung in June: O my Love is like the melody, That's sweetly played in tune. As fair art thou, my bonnie lass, So deep in love am I; And I will love thee still, my dear, Till a' the seas gang dry. But what does being “in …

Why are good people tempted to do wrong?

Deuteronomy 30.15-20, Psalm 119.1-8, 1 Corinthians 3.1-4, Matthew 5.21-37 Why are good people tempted to do wrong? Sometimes we just fall from the straight and narrow and do mean, selfish or spiteful things. But sometimes we convince ourselves that we’re still good people even though we’re doing something wrong. We tell ourselves that there are some people whose motives are totally wicked or self-regarding: criminals, liars, cheats, two-timers, fraudsters, and so on, but we are not that kind of person. We’re basically good people who just indulge in an occasional misdemeanour. So, for example, there’s Noble Cause Corruption, a phrase first coined apparently in 1992 to explain why police officers, judges, politicians, managers, teachers, social workers and so on sometimes get sucked into justifying actions which are really totally wrong, but on the grounds that they are doing them for a very good reason. A famous instance of noble cause corruption is the statement, by the late Lord Denni…