Skip to main content

Predicting the Future

Jeremiah 28.5-9 (NRSVA)

This passage describes a battle of the prophets, a sort of prophesying contest which happened in the Temple. The Prophet Hananiah faced down Jeremiah and told him that he was getting it all wrong. The Kingdom of Judah wasn’t facing disaster, instead things were just about to get a lot better. The heavy yoke of the King of Babylon was about to be broken and the people who’d already been taken away into exile would be allowed to return, bringing with them the treasured sacred objects that had been looted from the Temple..

This put Jeremiah in a difficult position. He was convinced that Hananiah was mistaken, but to deny the truth of such a hopeful prophecy wasn’t going to increase his own dismal popularity ratings. So he’d no alternative but to solemnly endorse what Hananiah was saying. ‘Amen! May the Lord do so; may the Lord fulfil the words that you have prophesied.’ But he added a warning. The reputation of people who promise good times will always be measured by whether their promises come true. There’s no Book of Hananiah in the Bible, despite his huge popular following at the time.

This conflict resonates with our situation. In the media we find a conflict going on between Hananiahs and Jeremiahs, people who are convinced that - if we’re vigilant and careful - life can return to something more like ‘normality’, and rival experts and leaders who believe a more cautious approach would be sensible if we want to avoid repeated local lockdowns or, worse still, a second wave of the pandemic. Events in other countries which thought they’d overcome the Coronavirus are not particularly encouraging.

For prophets and forecasters there’s also the question of what life will look like after the pandemic is finally over. Will it be business as usual? Will people be desperate to reestablish loved and familiar patterns of life and work? Or will there be fundamental changes, such as more homeworking and a ‘greening’ of the economy? 

And what will Church look like? Will we find we’ve got a new relevance to people as they join in, in greater numbers, with online worship and prayer? Will more circuit and district meetings take place on Zoom? Will patterns of face-to-face worship and church life change forever as we try out new approaches in the absence of the traditional hymn-prayer sandwich? Or will we quickly revert back to what we’re familiar with?

Which sides would Jeremiah and Hananiah take in this debate? Would Hananiah be assuring people that normal service can be resumed, while Jeremiah continued to prophesy doom and gloom? Or would Hananiah be promising radical changes to church life and worship, while Jeremiah warned that we could all too easily lapse back into the comfort of old ways?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more