Skip to main content

Out of the mouths of babes

Psalm 8
Psalm 8 is one of the psalms quoted by Jesus in the New Testament. In Matthew 21.16 he rebukes the Jewish priests and scribes, who’ve objected to children crying out ‘Hosanna to the Son of David.’ He quotes verse 2: ‘Have you never read, “Out of the mouths of infants and nursing babies you have prepared praise for yourself?”
In the Old Testament translation of the psalm the New Revised Standard Version renders this as ‘babes and infants’, prudishly omitting to make clear that these are ‘babes at the breast’. The odd thing about this is that babies can’t speak! Is it just the sheer joy and wonder that we experience when we’re with tiny children that confounds those who are unimpressed by God’s creation? This is something many of us have missed during lockdown.
Psalm 8 also revisits the astounding idea - first found in Genesis 1 - that we’re like God. Even though he’s created the universe, God still cares for each one of us. Have we been made ‘a little lower than God’ or ‘a little lower than the angels’? This depends on how we choose to translate the Hebrew word ‘gods’. If instead we opt for, ‘you have made us a little lower than the gods’ this implies that God is simply the chief, or sovereign, god in a pantheon of lesser heavenly beings. That might have been the original meaning but it’s not how Jewish people understood the psalm after the Exile in Babylon.
St Augustine was surely right when he said, partly on the strength of this psalm, ‘Blessed be God, who has promised humanity the gift of divinity.’ I suspect Augustine is also calculating that, if God can become human in Jesus, we can become divine by being adopted as sons and daughters of God through Jesus’ saving grace, an idea he would have got from St Paul. Perhaps it’s we, then, who are ‘the babes and sucklings’ (in spiritual terms) from whose mouths shall come the praise that destroys the arguments of naysayers who would argue there’s no meaning or purpose to existence and no Creator.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...