Skip to main content

The Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son

John 7.37-39 (NRSVA)
One of the more obscure arguments in Christian history concerns a phrase in the Nicene Creed, ‘We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son.’ Those words in italics constitute just one single word in Latin, ‘Filioque’. But from them sprang the ‘Filioque Controversy’. 
Roman Catholics, and subsequently Protestants too, believe that the Holy Spirit flows from Jesus as well as from God and draw their conviction about this from verses like verse 39: ‘Now he said this about the Spirit, which believers in him were to receive; for as yet there was no Spirit, because Jesus was not yet glorified.’ Other Christians maintain that this is incorrect. The Spirit comes from God alone and isn’t subservient to Jesus in any way, which presumably explains why some ancient texts read, ‘for as yet the Spirit had not been given’.
Jesus’ proclamation, paraphrasing Isaiah 55.1, that anyone who is thirsty may come to him to drink living water, comes on the last day of the Jewish Feast Of Tabernacles, when a jug of water from the Pool of Siloam was carried in solemn procession up to the altar in the Temple and poured out as a libation to God. During the Temple ceremony the congregation chanted words from Isaiah 12.3 ‘With joy you will draw water from the wells of salvation.’
The Scripture to which John refers in verse 38 is unclear, unless he is referring back to Isaiah 55.1. The closest alternative is a passage from the Old Testament Apocrypha, Sirach 24.30-1, where God’s Wisdom is compared to ‘a canal from a river, like a water channel into a garden. I said, “I will water my garden and drench my flowerbeds.”’ 
Because the living water flows ‘out of the believer’s belly’ in Greek, not the ‘heart’ as in English, there may be an allusion to the water which flowed from Jesus’ side on the Cross. And this leads on to the real meaning of what John has to say about the Spirit. Some people think the outpouring of the water on the Temple altar was a symbol of the outpouring of God’s Spirit on Israel. But for John, the Spirit can only become ‘a spring of water welling up to eternal life’ (John 4.14) when believers have put their trust in the crucified, risen and glorified Jesus.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his
14 comments
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a
1 comment
Read more

Meeting Jesus on Zoom

‘Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.’ (John 20.19-31 ( https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA) This is my second reflection about today’s Gospel reading but I wanted to write something about meeting Jesus on Zoom. Zoom’s been very useful during the lockdown, but it’s also got a bad press. Various mischief makers have gatecrashed meetings on Zoom, either to eavesdrop or make inappropriate comments. That’s why worshippers needed permission to join our on-line service this week. If they managed to press all the right buttons, and entered all the right codes, they should've found themselves looking at a screen not unlike the cartoon picture below of the eleven apostles trying to meet on Zoom with the risen Jesus. Anyone who couldn't see the service on the screen would've been in good company. In the cartoon Jesus has done something wrong. Either he hasn’t enabled Zoom to t
Post a Comment
Read more