Skip to main content

The first act of the Trinity

Genesis 1.2-2.4a NRVA
The first act of the Trinity was the creation of the universe, which is the same as to say that there has never been a time when God was not three-in-one. We know this because Genesis says that ‘in the beginning’ there was ‘God’ and ‘the Spirit of God swept over the face of the waters,’ or ‘rushed’ or ‘hovered’ over them - perhaps like a bird. And then John’s Gospel boldly goes on  to state that ‘in the beginning was The Word, and The Word was with God, and The Word was God.’ And this Word both spoke things into being, (‘and God said’), and ’came to his own... people’, to dwell with them and rescue them from the darkness that had engulfed the world in the course of human history.
That it was always in God’s nature to share our humanity should come as no surprise because Genesis goes on to say that ‘God created humankind in his image; male and female he created them.’ For us to be ‘like God’ in any credible way, God has got to have the innate potential to become ‘like us’.
There is also a sense in which the Spirit bridges the distance between God the Creator and God Incarnate. John’s use of the term ‘The Word’ to describe Jesus reminds us that in Hebrew thought God’s Wisdom had created the world, and Greek-speaking Jewish theologians had already identified God’s Wisdom with the Greek idea of ‘The Word’ before John’s Gospel was written. The Word as God’s creative Spirit rushing over the waters, and The Word dwelling among us ‘full of grace and truth’ are two of the ways in which we encounter God’s spirit of Wisdom.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...
Post a Comment
Read more

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more