Skip to main content

Rising to New Life with Christ

Romans 6.1b-11 (NRSVA)

The arguments which Paul sets out in his letter to the church in Rome became - much later - the foundations on which the Protestant interpretation of Christianity was constructed. They were also deeply influential for early Methodism. It was while he was listening to Martin Luther’s explanation of Paul’s Letter to the Romans that John Wesley found his heart strangely warmed by a new understanding of what being a disciple of Jesus really means.

Paul’s predicament was that he was eager to visit the new and influential church in Rome but most of the Christians there didn’t know him personally, and what they had heard about him had left them feeling deeply uneasy. Paul found himself compelled, therefore, to set out the truth about what he believed, in contrast to the stories that were circulating about his teaching.

Chief among these seems to have been the idea that human beings are irredeemably flawed by a deeply ingrained self-centredness and can only trust in God’s grace for forgiveness instead of striving to lead a holy life on their own merits. This much is true. Paul did believe this. But his opponents went on to misrepresent him by reporting that he didn’t believe it was even worth trying to lead a righteous way of life.

‘God forbid!’ says Paul, an expression which - then as now - really meant ‘By no means!’ or ‘No way!’ His true position was that Jesus’ death on the cross saves us from self-centredness by allowing us to leave our old self behind and rise to a new kind of life with him. By grace - the free and unmerited new start that we receive through his death - we are given the opportunity to be reborn. Baptism, says Paul, is the moment when Christians commit to dying with Christ in order to rise again to newness of life with him.

This led some would be disciples, the Emperor Constantine is a striking example, to postpone their baptism to the last possible moment in case they fell back into sin again. They made the mistake of seeing discipleship as a one-way progression, like the route now laid out around a shop to protect us from infection with the Coronavirus. Instead it’s a journey with the potential for ups and downs. We can all too easily fall back into our own self-centred ways and then we’ll need to renew our baptism vows.

That’s how the misunderstanding about Paul’s teaching arose. It’s one thing to say that if things go wrong we can try again. It’s entirely different, to say, as Paul’s opponents believed he was teaching, that we don’t need to try in the first place because we shall inevitably fail. 

John Wesley believed it is possible for someone to become perfect in faith, although he admitted it wasn’t very common. However, for those of us who fall short, the obligation to strive for perfection in Christ remains.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more

Luther and Loyola

James 1:17-27 Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23 Within Christianity there has always been a tension between two poles. At one end of the spectrum stands Martin Luther, who said that Christian faith is about trusting in God to put us right - or make us righteous - through the saving death of Jesus. Luther came to this conclusion when he was a professor of New Testament studies in a little town in Germany called Wittenberg. One year he decided to teach his students about Paul’s letter to the Romans and that’s when it suddenly dawned upon him that Christian faith is all about trust. At the other end of the spectrum , stands someone like Ignatius Loyola the founder of the Society of Jesus. He spent a lot of his later life in crisis, first struggling to overcome severe wounds that he had suffered when he was a soldier and then during two short periods locked up in a cell by the Spanish Inquisition. He came to believe that the Christian life is a similar sort of struggle, a lifelon...
Post a Comment
Read more