Skip to main content

Ascension on the Cross

John 17.1-11 (https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA)
In Luke’s Gospel Jesus ascends to God from a mountaintop, lifted up on a cloud. In John’s Gospel Jesus is lifted up on a cross. The passage ends with the assurance that Jesus and his ‘Holy Father’ are ‘one’, but for John this is a moral unity, a unity of purpose, rather than a metaphysical union of two natures, human and divine. They are ‘one’ because Jesus has ‘completed the work that [God] gave him to do,’ (verse 4).
That work was ‘to make God’s name known’, to share the words that God had given him, to gather around himself a group of trusted disciples who ‘know the truth’, and to be recognised as the one whom God sent, ‘Jesus Messiah’ - the Anointed One. We know from John’s description of Jesus’ death, and from other passages in the Gospel, that the decisive hour when that work was completed was on the Cross, when Jesus was glorified by God so that he in turn might give glory back to God and confirm God’s true nature as the suffering servant.
The tie in with the Ascension is that, as a consequence of his obedience to God in accepting death on a cross, Jesus is now ‘glorified in God’s ‘presence’ or ‘God’s self’, or ‘at ‘God’s side’, with the same glory that he had ‘with God’ or ‘at God’s side before the world existed,’ (verse 5). We are reminded of the opening words of the Gospel, ‘The Word was with God and the Word was God,’ (John 1.1). To those who have ‘accepted him’ ‘he gives the power’ or ‘the right to become children of God,’ (John 1.12). Or, as John puts it here, ‘they believed that you sent me’ (verse 8) and this means that they can share in the unity which God and Jesus enjoy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more