Skip to main content

Following in Discipleship


John 1.35-39a
This Bible study is based on a series of reflections about the meaning of discipleship by John Leach, an Anglican priest and discipleship adviser in the Diocese of Lincoln, which were first published in 2017 by the Bible Reading Fellowship. Where appropriate, I have given them a Methodist twist.
There has often been a view, for which John Wesley is partly responsible, that becoming a Christian is a one-off, static thing, a single episode rather than a process. We are saved, to use John Wesley’s terminology, we can know that we have been saved, and we are saved to the utmost. Wesley even believed that it was possible for a disciple to become a perfect Christian, perfect in faith and morals at any rate, although modern psychologists might doubt that.
If we are talking about becoming a Christian, crossing the line between belief and unbelief, doubt and conviction, then Wesley might be right. We can know that we have become believers and some of us can know exactly when it happened. Sometimes it happens more than once. People cross and recross the line, but it is still a static line that they are crossing.
But discipleship is dynamic. It’s a journey, a pilgrimage. It can begin tentatively, with faltering steps, and grow gradually more confident. It can meander a little. It can last a lifetime and the horizon can be forever changing as we journey on. It’s exciting, challenging, an adventure.
This is the sense in which we follow a career path, follow someone’s example, follow a team, follow a route to our destination, follow through on an idea or follow a school of thought.
The disciples did indeed follow Jesus on a physical journey, beginning when they left their nets and followed him up the mountain to be chosen to be his apostles, and continuing as they followed him around Galilee, to Jerusalem, to the cross, to the empty tomb and to the ends of the earth. St Peter is supposed to have ended up in Rome and Thomas in India.
But it was also more than a physical journey. It was a spiritual awakening as well. They set out not really understanding who Jesus was and ended it acknowledging him as their Lord and God.
In today’s Gospel reading Jesus’ two new disciples weren’t even sure who they were following, or where they were going, or why. They were following him only on the recommendation of their previous leader, John. The only thing they had been told was that Jesus was destined to be the Lamb of God, but they didn’t understand yet what that would mean. His invitation to them was to ‘come and see’. It was an invitation to a journey of discovery.
What does that mean for us? It means, I think, that we can be disciples without having all the answers, without a great many certainties, despite our doubts and hesitation. It means we are challenged to embark on the journey, or continue it, without knowing precisely where we are going, either as individuals or as a church. It means - despite what John Wesley may have said - that we don’t need to become perfect or do the perfect thing, but we do have to try.
Discipleship means seizing opportunities, living in the moment, accepting God’s guidance and - above all - being prepared to follow in a really dynamic and faithful way.
Based on ideas by John Leach in Guidelines, July 2017, Bible Reading Fellowship


QUESTIONS for reflection
  1. How do you feel about the idea of discipleship as ‘an invitation to a journey of discovery’? 
  2. Where do you feel you are on the journey?
  3. What aspects of discipleship do you find exciting or challenging?
  4. The first disciples had no idea where they would be going with Jesus or why. What is your understanding of where discipleship is taking us and why?
  5. What does dynamic and faithful discipleship look like today?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...