Skip to main content

You were going astray like sheep

1 Peter 2:19-25 (https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA)

On Songs of Praise a Methodist shepherd was trying to teach Aled Jones how to use a sheepdog to herd some ducks. ‘You’re not telling the dog what to do, Aled,’ he scolded as the ducks went in the wrong direction and the dog scurried around rather aimlessly at their heels. ‘I can’t remember the commands,’ Aled replied. Helen and I sympathised. We’re always struggling to remember the right commands for Phoebe, our son’s dog.
What persuades people to go in the right direction? Can they be nudged, like a sheepdog stealthily creeping into position to cut off the most obvious escape route? If the dog and the herder can work skillfully together the ducks will almost volunteer to be penned in. It becomes the obvious thing for them to do. In the same way, if the government nudges us to start a pension it becomes the accepted way forward when, without any shepherding, many of us might have decided to spend our money now rather than save it for the future.
How does God nudge us in the right direction? The writer of 1 Peter says God does it by leaving us an example of patient acceptance and total trust in the face of suffering. The example of Jesus on the cross heals us, says the writer, by encouraging us to live for righteousness and follow in his footsteps. ‘You were going astray like sheep,’ the writer concludes, ‘But now you have returned to the shepherd and guardian of your souls.’ The ducks are safely penned in. The shephard can quietly close the gate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...