Skip to main content

What it means to be a Christian

1 Peter 2.1-10 (https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA)
Here the author of 1 Peter uses some everyday images to describe different aspects of the Christian life. 
He begins by borrowing an idea from Paul and then expanding on it. Paul had reminded the Christians in Corinth that it’d been necessary to feed them with milk because they were ‘infants in Christ’ who weren’t ready yet for solid food. 
The author of 1 Peter says all Christians should ‘like newborn babies, drink spiritual unadulterated milk’ to ‘help [them] grow into salvation’. He’s no longer thinking, as Paul did, of milk as a starter food for people who aren't yet ready to digest the real thing. Instead, he’s thinking of it as a rich and creamy gift from God. This isn’t milk that’s been watered down to make it go further. It’s full-fat milk packed with nutrients - a gift to those who’ve ‘experienced that the Lord is kind’.
He then riffs on the idea of ‘Peter The Rock’. But he reminds his readers that the true rock on which the Church is founded is ‘the Living Stone’, who is Jesus. Although he was ‘rejected by humans...in God’s eyes [he] was select and precious’ and his followers are being ‘built up into a spiritual house’ which rests on this ‘cornerstone’.
And yet, ‘what is precious’ to some people seems ‘worthless’ and just a ‘trip hazard’ to those who don’t believe in its value. What they fail to recognise is that if they’d allow themselves to be incorporated into the body of Christ they’d gain a new and unshakeable identity. They’d be transformed from stateless refugees, condemned to wander around in search of a purpose, into ‘the People of God’.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a

Meeting Jesus on Zoom

‘Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.’ (John 20.19-31 ( https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA) This is my second reflection about today’s Gospel reading but I wanted to write something about meeting Jesus on Zoom. Zoom’s been very useful during the lockdown, but it’s also got a bad press. Various mischief makers have gatecrashed meetings on Zoom, either to eavesdrop or make inappropriate comments. That’s why worshippers needed permission to join our on-line service this week. If they managed to press all the right buttons, and entered all the right codes, they should've found themselves looking at a screen not unlike the cartoon picture below of the eleven apostles trying to meet on Zoom with the risen Jesus. Anyone who couldn't see the service on the screen would've been in good company. In the cartoon Jesus has done something wrong. Either he hasn’t enabled Zoom to t