Skip to main content

Death be not proud


God raised him up, having freed him from death, because it was impossible for him to be held in its power. Acts 2.14a, 22-32 (https://www.biblegateway.com NRSVA)
Last week we looked at one of the passages in The Acts of the Apostles in which Luke sets out ‘The Kerygma’, the first proclamation of the Gospel by the Early Church. This is another of those passages. It comes from the section of Acts which describes the coming of the Holy Spirit upon the first Christians, and that’s where we normally focus our attention, but this is actually the first declaration of what the Early Christians believed about Jesus. 
This sermon is very similar to the one we read on Easter Day, but two things stand out. Peter stresses that the betrayal and execution of Jesus wasn't an accident, or even a victory for evil over goodness. It happened ‘according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God.’ It was intentional. Second, he zooms in on the resurrection; ‘God raised him up, having freed him from death, because it was impossible for him to be held in its power.’ For added effect Peter paraphrases Psalm 16.10, ‘He was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh experience corruption.’
In the television adaptation of Fortunes of War by Olivia Manning, the main protagonists, Guy and Harriet Pringle, flee from Greece ahead of the invading German army on a battered cargo ship. Suddenly it’s threatened by a marauding u-boat. The engines are cut and everyone has to stay absolutely silent to avoid detection. As the sun sets the only sound is Guy, reading quietly - but still audibly - the words of John Donne’s poem, ‘Death be not proud.’ It’s a memorable image, although in the books Guy is actually a committed atheist.
‘Death, be not proud,’ writes Donne, ‘Though some have called thee mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so; for those whom thou think'st thou dost overthrow die not, poor Death, nor yet canst thou kill me.’

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more