Skip to main content

God’s living and enduring Word

1 Peter 1. 17-23 www.biblegateway.com NRSVA
Last week we saw that the writer of this letter seems to have known John’s Gospel, so it comes as no surprise when he alludes to it again as he quotes the words of Jesus in John 13.34, ‘Love one another’. He also alludes to a passage in St Paul’s letter to the Romans, who also quotes those same words of Jesus and goes on to link them with ‘genuine mutual love’ in Romans 9.10. The fact that the two phrases occur side by side in 1 Peter 1.23 suggests that the writer may, on this occasion, be borrowing from Paul. This idea is further reinforced when he goes on to allude to 1 Timothy 1.5, when he says ‘love one another deeply from the heart’. But he is definitely referring to ideas gleaned from John’s Gospel when he talks about ‘being born anew of imperishable seed’ (John 1.13 and 3.3).
What we’re discovering here is that the letter juxtaposes ideas from earlier Christian writers to show what a genuine Christian looks like. They’re someone who models the love of Jesus in their own life because ‘the living and enduring Word of God’ (John 1.1) is with them to bring them into a new life which makes this possible.
And Jesus is God’s ‘living and enduring Word’ because, after he rescued us from a ‘futile way’ of life (Romans 8.20) through his death on the cross, ‘God raised him from the dead’ so that our ‘faith and hope’ might be ‘set on God’.
The writer of 1 Peter is doing Bible study here, taking passages from other parts of the New Testament - particularly from Paul and John - to help us understand what Jesus means for us today.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more