Skip to main content

Reflections on the Seven Words of Jesus from the Cross: 2 Paradise

He replied, ‘Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise.’ Luke 23.43 (www.biblegateway.com NRSVA)
When Jesus tells the man hanging beside him on the Cross that they will be together in Paradise he’s talking about the dwelling place of God. He means that nothing, not even a terrible death, can separate them both from God’s love.
In Islam Paradise is a second Eden, a place of sensual delight and happiness. I think that for the Prophet Muhammad that’s just a vivid way of describing the same thing, a state of blessedness with God. But there is sufficient ambiguity in the Qur’anic picture of Paradise to allow readers to translate the same word either as ‘juicy raisins’ or as ‘virgins’, suggesting a state of sexual rather than spiritual gratification which has spurred on some people, with an incomplete grasp of Islam, to entirely the wrong kind of commitment, liberally laced with self-centredness and self-gratification.
And so that same image, Paradise, has inspired the most terrible acts of hatred and destructiveness but also the most selfless acts of generosity and love. 
When people find themselves in a hard place - like the doctors, nurses and carers who must go to work not knowing for certain that they will always come back - there is still the promise that nothing can separate them from God’s love. But the most amazing thing is that the man hanging beside Jesus gets to share in that same promise of blessedness, even though it is almost undeserved. And we can all share in the same promise of Paradise so long as we put our trust in the words of Jesus to the penitent thief.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On "Crazy People", By Casting Crowns

On Crazy People, by Casting Crowns When I heard the song, I liked it. It’s funny. I’m not sure it’s woke, though. If you know what I mean?  Woke means ‘being alert to racial discrimination and other kinds of prejudice’. And some people feel that the word crazy is un woke because it stigmatizes mental health issues.  According to woke people, calling someone crazy seems to imply that he or she isn’t living in the real world and can’t make rational decisions, that they’re mentally deranged.  I looked up the politically correct alternatives to crazy. A woke dictionary suggested, ‘ irration al , r idiculous , s illy and a bsurd’. If you think it actually is absurd to suggest that the word crazy can be replaced by the word absurd then I guess you’re un woke. But crazy does have wider meanings that have nothing to do with mental health. It can mean ‘to be infatuated with someone’ or ‘to be passionately excited or very enthusiastic about something’.  I guess the song wr...
Post a Comment
Read more

I don't believe in an interventionist God

Matthew 28.1-10, 1 Corinthians 15.1-11 I like Nick Cave’s song because of its audacious first line: ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. What an unlikely way to begin a love song! He once explained that he wrote the song while sitting at the back of an Anglican church where he had gone with his wife Susie, who presumably does believe in an interventionist God - at least that’s what the song says. Actually Cave has always been very interested in religion. Sometimes he calls himself a Christian, sometimes he doesn’t, depending on how the mood takes him. He once said, ‘I believe in God in spite of religion, not because of it.’ But his lyrics often include religious themes and he has also said that any true love song is a song for God. So maybe it’s no coincidence that he began this song in such an unlikely way, although he says the inspiration came to him during the sermon. The vicar was droning on about something when the first line of the song just popped into his ...
14 comments
Read more

Giotto’s Nativity and Adoration of the Shepherds

John 1.10-18 In the week before Christmas the BBC broadcast a modern version of The Nativity which attempted to retell the story with as much psychological realism as possible. So, for instance, viewers saw how Mary, and Joseph especially, struggled with their feelings. But telling the story of Jesus with psychological realism is not a new idea. It has a long tradition going back seven hundred years to the time of the Italian artist Giotto di Bondone. This nativity scene was painted in a church in Padua in about 1305. Much imitated it is one of the first attempts at psychological realism in Christian art. And what a wonderful first attempt it is - a work of genius, in fact! Whereas previously Mary and the Baby Jesus had been depicted facing outwards, or looking at their visitors, with beatific expressions fixed on their faces, Giotto dares to show them staring intently into one another’s eyes, bonding like any mother and newborn baby. Joseph, in contrast, is not looking on with quiet a...
1 comment
Read more